MathipediaThe free math encyclopedia

Divisibility

test A number is said to divide another number if that number is an integer multiple of that number. For example, 5 divides 30 because there exists the integer 6 that can be multiplied with 5 to get 30. We notate this as such:

5 ∣ 305\ |\ 30

Formally it is defined like this:

A number nn is said to divide mm if there exists an integer kk that satisfies m=nkm=nk.

a ∣ b ↔∃k∈Z, a∗k=ba\ |\ b \leftrightarrow \exists k\in\Bbb Z, a*k=b

It may seem repetive to define divisibility when we already have division as a standard arithmatic operator, but notice that we have not used any division here! Multiplication is generally a much more versatile tool than divison because it does not have restrictions like divison does (cannot divide by zero, division is not a “closed operation”).

Of course dividing by zero is easy to avoid when you have known values, but if all you know about a number xx is that it is an integer then asserting that y=2÷xy=2 \div x may not be correct.

Proofs with Divisibility

Prove that if a ∣ ba\ |\ b and a ∣ ca\ |\ c that a ∣ (b−c)a\ |\ (b-c).

If a ∣ ba\ |\ b and a ∣ ca\ |\ c then there exists integers k1,k2k_1,k_2 such that ak1=bak_1=b and ak2=cak_2=c. So a ∣ (b−c)a\ |\ (b-c) can be rewritten as a ∣ (ak1−ak2)=a ∣ a(k1−k2)a\ |\ (ak_1-ak_2) = a\ |\ a(k_1-k_2). Because k1,k2∈Zk_1,k_2 \in \Bbb Z and the set of integers is closed over subtraction then the difference between them is also an integer. By definition a number will divide an integer multiple of iteself, so this is true.